|
The first person is asked to resist the pushing. Supposedly, this is because the collective wisdom of mankind is stored in one's muscles.This is obviously absurd. In brief, a person holds his arm horizontally while a second person pushes down on the arm with two fingers above the wrist. Moreover, Hawkins claims that this strong and weak test is true for all people and all cultures and is absolutely valid. In "Power vs.
Anyone can do this by using his own intuition and discernment. domination, openness vs secrecy, and so on. Therefore--and this is the outrageous part--this test can be used to test the truth of anything from a political regime to a TV commercial. force, freedom vs. On the other hand, if a concept tests "weak," the person cannot successfully resist the push, and his arm will go down. One could just as easily claim that universal truth could be detected by how quickly one blinks his eyes and set up "tests" to prove that it is valid.If this book has any validity, it is that human beings benefit from considering psychological and spiritual dichotomies such as power vs. According to Hawkins, if a concept tests "strong," the person will be able to resist the pushing on his arm, no matter how strong. Nevertheless, Hawkins feels compelled to base his entire book on this theory.
Force," David Hawkins attempts to set up an absolute test for truth using kinesiology. While there may be some correlation between ideas and physiological responses (a polygraph is based on this claim), to assert that such responses are universal and absolute and independent of any conscious knowledge is laughable. You don't need to hold your arm out and have someone push down on it to know that the message of Jesus Christ is more powerful than the message of Adolph Hitler. A concept or idea is then introduced (for example, Adolph Hitler or Jesus Christ). Hawkins claims all would test strong for Jesus Christ and weak for Adolph Hitler, regardless of whether they had any knowledge or information about the subjects.
Screw all the controversy over muscle testing. Oh, today he doesn't wear glasses either. The man is healed and that makes him an inspiration to A Course in Miracle Students. Hawkins was once an overweight, alcoholic, successful clinical psychologist who had almost 2 dozen chronic, intractable health problems that had plagued him for 20 or more years (half of which could have killed him) and had worn Coke-bottle eyeglasses since a child. He began a study of A Course in Miracles not long after its publication (he knew both Helen Schucman and Bill Thetford) and slowly began healing his physical conditions one by one as his mind healed.
Another energy medicine doctor uses muscle tests to find weak energy spots in the body. One uses telekinetic chiropractic adjustments by using muscle tests to find the problem: another uses muscle testing to find the correct numbers to insert into a frequency generator, because the viruses, bacteria, and parasites are constantly changing the frequencies are also changing. I've heard of several doctors that use this technique to heal.
Practicing to get accurate answers from your own body telling you either, yes or no: or, strong or weak: is a most valuable tool to possess. The premise of the book is that the subconscious can be accessed through muscle testing, even when the conscious mind doesn't know the answers the subconscious mind does know. This is one of the books that is a must read for anyone who wants to learn to do kinesiology, muscle testing.
The author ingeniously uses the technique to find answers. Get this book; it's a great read and the information is fascinating. The uses are far reaching.
It can be used for healing the physical, mental, emotional, spiritual, financial aspects of ones life.
I would recommend it to those interested in self-discovery and growth. This was an interesting read.
Everyone should have it for reference in their library for life. The book is fantastic.
|
